Maybe he'd like something more noticable??? - Shot Talk

Highline · iTrader: (0) #1 (**permalink**) 03-19-2006, 11:59 PM

Better than those others???

Explorer or Daytona?

**VtDivot** · iTrader: (0) #2 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 12:07 AM

bling - I'll take one of each. I'll trade you my ESQ

Davebud · iTrader: (0) #3 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 12:24 AM

Of course I am just a classless idiot, so my vote carries absoulutely no bearing.

Witmaster · iTrader: (0) #4 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 08:59 AM

It would really depend on the occasion for wear...

The top watch has a more contemporary feel so i would be likely to wear it for more "routine events".

The bottom have a "classical" look so I would be inclined to wear those for more formal occasions. Now.. that said, I would probably go with the onyx face as it accentuates the details in the face and hands.

But... That's just me.

**Pa Jayhawk** · iTrader: (0) #5 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 09:11 AM

Now it is just a matter of his style. My style probably more matches the the first one on here, as I have more of a conservative style when it comes to watches. I also prefer more of a matte finish.

Silver · iTrader: (0) #6 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 11:34 AM

All of those are pimp.

Good stuff.

Rockford35 · iTrader: (5) #7 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 02:55 PM

I disagree, S. All are weak.

The industrial army look is old with those bands. Get something with some class.

R35

Silver · iTrader: (0) #8 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 03:07 PM

True Rock, I dislike the bands as well. I like the faces though. Or at the very least, I don't find them revolting.

The bands definitely need some updating. I like my band, personally. (if I'm feeling unlazy later, I'll take a shot of it)

**Bravo** · iTrader: (0) #9 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 03:40 PM

I've had a Seiko Kinetic watch for five years that has been nothing but a mess...theoretically it is a watch that will run forever on your wrist without ever needing maintenance. It has no battery and is powered by a capacitor that is energized by the movement of your wrist/arm. It also had a good looking rugged band that I liked..I paid about $300USD for this watch.

The band has broken about five times and I had to have the electronics repaired a year ago. I have put more into the watch in repairs than I paid for the damn thing...

So today I bought a cheap watch on Overstock.com...$59USD including tax...

**DaveE** · iTrader: (0) #10 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 03:48 PM

I have two watches that I stopped wearing when I noticed that I always look at my cell phone when I want to know the time.

Slingblade61 · iTrader: (1) #11 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 03:52 PM

Forget the watches.

Get the guy a power washer.

**Scotty01292** · iTrader: (0) #12 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 03:55 PM

The bottom watch is cool.

I've got a rubbish Ben Sherman thing. It cost me $45 when I was on holiday to Florida.

Silver · iTrader: (0) #13 (**permalink**) 03-20-2006, 06:15 PM

here we go - a band that I actually like:

ignore the fact that everything on the watch is scratched except the sapphire glass (thank you for sapphire glass) - maybe I'm just a klutz

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode