Quote:
Originally Posted by eclark53520 So if what i gather about compression is true(the further youy compress the ball the harder the ball needs to be) why arnt all balls this 'gradational compession core'?
Seems that if that technology exists it would be possible to make a ball or a series of balls that would fit almost all golfers.
Its obviously not manufacturing costs as the treosoft claims to have this technology yet is oneof the cheaper balls on the market. Or is this just a marketing scheme and a play on words whent a TRUE gradational core is a physical impossibility?
What about some sort of nutonian liquid core? |
I was actually reading about this a while back and found the Precept site that has a great presentation of how golf balls work. If you go to the last page they explain the relationship between cover, core materials, multidensity cores and multilayer balls. Cools stuff and they
are getting closer to a golf ball that works well for almost any golfer except at the very extreme ends of the spectrum.
The Science of Golfballs
Oh yeah, after watching the "How It's Made" video of a visit to Titleist and watching them make Pro V1's, I find it hard to believe it costs much more to make them vs. any other ball. I'm an engineer (although not a golf ball engineer

) and work around plastic molding production quite a bit. I would be surprised if the actual manufacturing cost differences from a company's high end ball and low end ball are more than pennies per ball. My guess is that the only cost differences are in materials and possibly some assembly cost but golf ball manufacturing is pretty much all automated.
I suspect that just like golf clubs, the major difference in cost is in the sales and marketing side and not the production/manufacturing costs themselves.