Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Butcho22 As far as not taking lessons because it might mess you up, that garbage. 99.9% or all touring pros in history have taken at least a few lessons....what makes you think you're any different?
Maybe you need to get together for a few rounds with some scratch players......getting beat will give you the motivation you need to get better. You probably feel like Tiger Woods himself while playing with your duffer buddies. |
Retief Goosen never took a lesson.
Neither Sam Snead...
BTW, I already have the motivation to get better. But that doesn't mean I should take any lesson.
I know what parts of my game I need to improve, and know how to improve it. I'm an autodidact and read all that technical swing babble. I can teach anybody how to swing, chip, putt. It doesn't mean I'm good at it.
But do I have the time to practice? No.
Do you know how many hours a day pro practice around the green? It's their job.
And you think it's garbage that taking lessons might mess you up?
Look at Lee Trevino. He had his swing, and he bought into taking lessons and changing his swing because he could improve. Look how messed up he played after.
The same goes for Jim Furyk. He had his particular upright swing. He changed it to a more conventional one, then switched back to his more natural one because he played better with it.
I can name just by head Steve Lowery, David Duval (even though his problem may be more psychological, but nevertheless....).
And of course Tiger Woods: the prime example of swing change, and the slump he was in because of it. Good think he has the dedication to go through it all the way.
So yes, lessons can be beneficial. But why change something if it works well already?