I've gotta be winning this thing.
Welcome To ShotTalk.com!
We are one of the oldest and largest Golf forums on the internet with golfers from around the world sharing tips, photos and planning golf outings.
Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon!
I reckon youre right.I've gotta be winning this thing.
Sizzle: Tiger Woods
Fizzle: Alex Noren
Hey now, the doctor cleared him for slow-mo chipping so there's still a chance...This seems really stoopid right now...
Hey now, the doctor cleared him for slow-mo chipping so there's still a chance...
That one is lookin' pretty good!!!Sizzle: Hideki Matsuyama
Fizzle: Danny Willett (if he qualifies) If not, Justin Rose.
When you posted in April 3rd... it was "stooped". Today.... It's even "stoopedier"!!!This seems really stoopid right now...
Thank you kind sir!That one is lookin' pretty good!!!
When you posted in April 3rd... it was "stooped". Today.... It's even "stoopedier"!!!
So a negative score is good?The calculation is below:
(SizzleEndWGR - SizzleStartWGR) + (-(FizzleEndWGR - FizzleStartWGR)) = Total Adjusted Score
lol, uh.....no
I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.I typed it in exactly as you described.
Siz End - start + (-) Fiz end - start
Rahm's sizzle went from 137 to 5 (5-137)
Kirk's fizzle went from 74 to 136 (136-74)
(5-137) + (-(136-74))
(-132)+(-(62)
-132-62= -194
I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.
I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.
Anyone else having trouble posting? It's acting very strange lately.
Anyone else having trouble posting? It's acting very strange lately.