• Welcome To ShotTalk.com!

    We are one of the oldest and largest Golf forums on the internet with golfers from around the world sharing tips, photos and planning golf outings.

    Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon!

Regret City: The USGA and Dustin Johnson Ruling

Dogfish Head

Well-Known Member
Staff member
TEA is my HERO
Apr 8, 2012
1,101
391
Huntsville, AL
Country
United States United States
THE USGA DOESN'T CALL THIS an apology. But I think we can call it an apology. It registers a 10 on the regret meter. Players and others in the golf world, in what seemed like a unanimous voice, blasted the organization for its handling of the Dustin Johnson rules incident during the final round of the U.S. Open. Fortunately, DJ cruised to his first major win despite the distraction.


USGA Statement Regarding Dustin Johnson Ruling

The USGA wishes to congratulate Dustin Johnson on his victory and thank him, and the other players in the field, for their professionalism and grace throughout the championship. Dustin is a wonderful champion, a talented golfer and a gentleman.

Our team at the USGA has seen and heard a great deal of discussion and debate about the ruling on Dustin’s ball moving during the final round of the 2016 U.S. Open Championship at Oakmont Country Club. In addition to the explanations we offered upon the conclusion of the final round, we add these comments.


Upon reflection, we regret the distraction caused by our decision to wait until the end of the round to decide on the ruling. It is normal for rulings based on video evidence to await the end of a round, when the matter can be discussed with the player before the score card is returned. While our focus on getting the ruling correct was appropriate, we created uncertainty about where players stood on the leader board after we informed Dustin on the 12th tee that his actions on the fifth green might lead to a penalty. This created unnecessary ambiguity for Dustin and the other players, as well as spectators on-site, and those watching and listening on television and digital channels.


During any competition, the priority for Rules officials is to make the correct ruling for the protection of the player(s) involved and the entire field. In applying Rule 18-2, which deals with a ball at rest that moves, officials consider all the relevant evidence – including the player’s actions, the time between those actions and the movement of the ball, the lie of the ball, and course and weather conditions. If that evidence, considered together, shows that it is more likely than not that the player’s actions caused the ball to move, the player incurs a one-stroke penalty. Officials use this “more likely than not” standard because it is not always apparent what caused the ball to move. Such situations require a review of the evidence, with Decision 18-2/0.5 providing guidance on how the evidence should be weighed.


Our officials reviewed the video of Dustin on the fifth green and determined that based on the weight of the evidence, it was more likely than not that Dustin caused his ball to move. Dustin’s putter contacted the ground at the side of the ball, and almost immediately after, the ball moved.


We accept that not everyone will agree that Dustin caused his ball to move. Issues under Rule 18-2 often require a judgment where there is some uncertainty, and this was one of those instances. We also understand that some people may disagree with Rule 18-2 itself. While we respect the viewpoints of those who disagree, our Committee made a careful and collective judgment in its pursuit of a fair competition played under the Rules of Golf.


In keeping with our commitment to excellence in all aspects of our work on behalf of the game of golf, we pledge to closely examine our procedures in this matter. We will assess our procedures for handling video review, the timing of such, and our communication with players to make sure that when confronted with such a situation again, we will have a better process.



We at the USGA deeply appreciate the support of players, fans, and the entire golf community of our championships and our other work for golf – and we appreciate your feedback as well. We have established an email address ([email protected]) and phone mailbox (908-326-1857) to receive comments. We thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts.




Source: Regret City: The USGA and Dustin Johnson Ruling
 

MCDavis

The Plaid Duffer
Staff member
Moderator
Oct 19, 2006
13,633
5,195
Sanford, NC
Country
United States United States
Translation: we're not going to admit we blew it. Instead, we're going to quote rules and continue to be dicks.
 

MCDavis

The Plaid Duffer
Staff member
Moderator
Oct 19, 2006
13,633
5,195
Sanford, NC
Country
United States United States
DJ's ball moved after coming to rest on the green. USGA is saying that because he put his putter down beside it, DJ caused it to move which is a 1 stroke penalty.

No way they're gonna say "We made the greens so damn slick that a worm's erection could move the ball".
 

TheTrueReview

"Playing it straight"
Supporting Member
Jan 8, 2009
8,204
6,042
Country
Australia Australia
I carefully read the USGA's release. As a lawyer I understand the 'more likely than not' test applied. It appears fair.

The flaw in the statement is its failure to address the effect of the initial advice to Johnson clearing him of any penalty liability. It is the mid-round backflip by the USGA and its impact on the player, that has caused the uproar about apparent unfairness. The USGA has avoided explaining the situation with the rules official to its detriment.
 

limpalong

Mental Ward Escapee
Supporting Member
Oct 18, 2006
13,821
13,653
I forgot!
Country
United States United States
The USGA is forced to congratulate Dustin Johnson on his victory and supposed we should thank him, and the other players in the field, for their professionalism and grace that we and our staff did not show throughout the championship. As much as we hate to admit it Dustin is a wonderful champion, a talented golfer and a gentleman.

Our team at the USGA has seen and heard a great deal of discussion and debate about the ruling on Dustin’s ball moving during the final round of the 2016 U.S. Open Championship at Oakmont Country Club. The air has been full of criticism and complaint from touring pros, people who play this game both as a career and for recreation, and almost 100% of those who witnessed our screw up. In addition to the explanations we offered upon the conclusion of the final round, we add these comments.

Upon reflection, we regret the distraction caused by our decision to wait until the end of the round to decide on the ruling. Our handling of a non-issue provided this distraction, yet we won't take responsibility for it. It is normal for rulings based on video evidence to await the end of a round, when the matter can be discussed with the player before the score card is returned. While our focus on getting the ruling correct was appropriate, we created uncertainty about where players stood on the leader board after we informed Dustin on the 12th tee that his actions on the fifth green might lead to a penalty. This created unnecessary ambiguity for Dustin and the other players, as well as spectators on-site, and those watching and listening on television and digital channels.

During any competition, the priority for Rules officials is to make the correct ruling for the protection of the player(s) involved and the entire field. In this case, whether or not a penalty was applied had no effect on protection of the field. In fact, the distraction had a detrimental effect on the entire field including the eventual winner. But, causing the distraction allowed the USGA to display just how much power we have over the players and the Game. In applying Rule 18-2, which deals with a ball at rest that moves, officials consider all the relevant evidence – including the player’s actions, the time between those actions and the movement of the ball, the lie of the ball, and course and weather conditions. If that evidence, considered together, shows that it is more likely than not that the player’s actions caused the ball to move, the player incurs a one-stroke penalty. Officials use this “more likely than not” standard because it is not always apparent what caused the ball to move. Such situations require a review of the evidence, with Decision 18-2/0.5 providing guidance on how the evidence should be weighed.

Our officials reviewed the video of Dustin on the fifth green and determined that based on the weight of the evidence, Dustin did not cause his ball to move. Dustin’s putter contacted the ground at the side of the ball, not behind the ball which was the direction the ball eventually moved. Had we allowed this to move forward with nothing other than the volunteer referee following the group being the last work, no power over the Game would have been displayed.

We accept that not everyone will agree that Dustin caused his ball to move. Issues under Rule 18-2 often require a judgment where there is some uncertainty, and this was one of those instances. We also understand that some people may disagree with Rule 18-2 itself. While the viewpoints of those who disagree are nothing but the opinions of rank amateurs, our Committee made a careful and collective judgment in its pursuit of a fair competition played under the Rules of Golf.

In keeping with our commitment to excellence in all aspects of our work on behalf of the game of golf, we pledge to closely examine our procedures in this matter. We even brought forward our esteemed Director, even though it was easily seen she had been imbibing entirely too long in the beer tents. We will assess our procedures for handling video review, the timing of such, and our communication with players to make sure that when confronted with such a situation again, we will have a better process.


We at the USGA really could care less about the support of players, fans, and the entire golf community of our championships and our other work for golf – and you can take your feedback and shove it where the sun don't shine as well. We have established an email address ([email protected]) and phone mailbox (908-326-1857upload_2016-6-21_17-52-51.png) to receive comments. Comment if you must. It won't make any difference as we haven't considered input on previous decisions such as groove rulings and putter anchoring rulings.
 

Fairwaysplitter3320

Recovering Equipment Ho...off the wagon again.
Staff member
Admin
Sep 7, 2013
11,036
7,750
Chapel Hill, TN
Country
United States United States
The USGA is forced to congratulate Dustin Johnson on his victory and supposed we should thank him, and the other players in the field, for their professionalism and grace that we and our staff did not show throughout the championship. As much as we hate to admit it Dustin is a wonderful champion, a talented golfer and a gentleman.

Our team at the USGA has seen and heard a great deal of discussion and debate about the ruling on Dustin’s ball moving during the final round of the 2016 U.S. Open Championship at Oakmont Country Club. The air has been full of criticism and complaint from touring pros, people who play this game both as a career and for recreation, and almost 100% of those who witnessed our screw up. In addition to the explanations we offered upon the conclusion of the final round, we add these comments.

Upon reflection, we regret the distraction caused by our decision to wait until the end of the round to decide on the ruling. Our handling of a non-issue provided this distraction, yet we won't take responsibility for it. It is normal for rulings based on video evidence to await the end of a round, when the matter can be discussed with the player before the score card is returned. While our focus on getting the ruling correct was appropriate, we created uncertainty about where players stood on the leader board after we informed Dustin on the 12th tee that his actions on the fifth green might lead to a penalty. This created unnecessary ambiguity for Dustin and the other players, as well as spectators on-site, and those watching and listening on television and digital channels.

During any competition, the priority for Rules officials is to make the correct ruling for the protection of the player(s) involved and the entire field. In this case, whether or not a penalty was applied had no effect on protection of the field. In fact, the distraction had a detrimental effect on the entire field including the eventual winner. But, causing the distraction allowed the USGA to display just how much power we have over the players and the Game. In applying Rule 18-2, which deals with a ball at rest that moves, officials consider all the relevant evidence – including the player’s actions, the time between those actions and the movement of the ball, the lie of the ball, and course and weather conditions. If that evidence, considered together, shows that it is more likely than not that the player’s actions caused the ball to move, the player incurs a one-stroke penalty. Officials use this “more likely than not” standard because it is not always apparent what caused the ball to move. Such situations require a review of the evidence, with Decision 18-2/0.5 providing guidance on how the evidence should be weighed.

Our officials reviewed the video of Dustin on the fifth green and determined that based on the weight of the evidence, Dustin did not cause his ball to move. Dustin’s putter contacted the ground at the side of the ball, not behind the ball which was the direction the ball eventually moved. Had we allowed this to move forward with nothing other than the volunteer referee following the group being the last work, no power over the Game would have been displayed.

We accept that not everyone will agree that Dustin caused his ball to move. Issues under Rule 18-2 often require a judgment where there is some uncertainty, and this was one of those instances. We also understand that some people may disagree with Rule 18-2 itself. While the viewpoints of those who disagree are nothing but the opinions of rank amateurs, our Committee made a careful and collective judgment in its pursuit of a fair competition played under the Rules of Golf.

In keeping with our commitment to excellence in all aspects of our work on behalf of the game of golf, we pledge to closely examine our procedures in this matter. We even brought forward our esteemed Director, even though it was easily seen she had been imbibing entirely too long in the beer tents. We will assess our procedures for handling video review, the timing of such, and our communication with players to make sure that when confronted with such a situation again, we will have a better process.


We at the USGA really could care less about the support of players, fans, and the entire golf community of our championships and our other work for golf – and you can take your feedback and shove it where the sun don't shine as well. We have established an email address ([email protected]) and phone mailbox (908-326-1857View attachment 28123) to receive comments. Comment if you must. It won't make any difference as we haven't considered input on previous decisions such as groove rulings and putter anchoring rulings.
Well played.
 

PaPaD

Geezer, recovering club ho.
Supporting Member
Jan 5, 2015
8,707
10,396
Fredericksburg VA & Hernando FLA
Country
United States United States
Here is the letter I just fired off to the USGA at [email protected]. I have no expectation that anyone who cares will read it.

Dear USGA,

Based on how badly your staff handled this incident, my wife and I regret to inform you that we will no longer support your organization. It is obvious that your staff was not only ill-prepared to handle the ruling on the spot, but they did a miserable job on camera explaining the justification. Mr. Johnston asked for a ruling on the 5th hole, he got a ruling from your staffer and the matter should have been closed. The decision to wait 7 holes later to inform the player was in poor judgement, and the decision to only tell him that he might be penalized was even worse. Your organization is responsible for establishing and enforcing the rules of golf and you demonstrated that you are incapable of doing it efficiently. You embarrassed your organization and your leadership.

Steve
D'Andrea
 

IrishGolfer

Fac ut gaudeam
Supporting Member
Sep 1, 2004
6,542
4,976
The USGA is forced to congratulate Dustin Johnson on his victory and supposed we should thank him, and the other players in the field, for their professionalism and grace that we and our staff did not show throughout the championship. As much as we hate to admit it Dustin is a wonderful champion, a talented golfer and a gentleman.

Our team at the USGA has seen and heard a great deal of discussion and debate about the ruling on Dustin’s ball moving during the final round of the 2016 U.S. Open Championship at Oakmont Country Club. The air has been full of criticism and complaint from touring pros, people who play this game both as a career and for recreation, and almost 100% of those who witnessed our screw up. In addition to the explanations we offered upon the conclusion of the final round, we add these comments.

Upon reflection, we regret the distraction caused by our decision to wait until the end of the round to decide on the ruling. Our handling of a non-issue provided this distraction, yet we won't take responsibility for it. It is normal for rulings based on video evidence to await the end of a round, when the matter can be discussed with the player before the score card is returned. While our focus on getting the ruling correct was appropriate, we created uncertainty about where players stood on the leader board after we informed Dustin on the 12th tee that his actions on the fifth green might lead to a penalty. This created unnecessary ambiguity for Dustin and the other players, as well as spectators on-site, and those watching and listening on television and digital channels.

During any competition, the priority for Rules officials is to make the correct ruling for the protection of the player(s) involved and the entire field. In this case, whether or not a penalty was applied had no effect on protection of the field. In fact, the distraction had a detrimental effect on the entire field including the eventual winner. But, causing the distraction allowed the USGA to display just how much power we have over the players and the Game. In applying Rule 18-2, which deals with a ball at rest that moves, officials consider all the relevant evidence – including the player’s actions, the time between those actions and the movement of the ball, the lie of the ball, and course and weather conditions. If that evidence, considered together, shows that it is more likely than not that the player’s actions caused the ball to move, the player incurs a one-stroke penalty. Officials use this “more likely than not” standard because it is not always apparent what caused the ball to move. Such situations require a review of the evidence, with Decision 18-2/0.5 providing guidance on how the evidence should be weighed.

Our officials reviewed the video of Dustin on the fifth green and determined that based on the weight of the evidence, Dustin did not cause his ball to move. Dustin’s putter contacted the ground at the side of the ball, not behind the ball which was the direction the ball eventually moved. Had we allowed this to move forward with nothing other than the volunteer referee following the group being the last work, no power over the Game would have been displayed.

We accept that not everyone will agree that Dustin caused his ball to move. Issues under Rule 18-2 often require a judgment where there is some uncertainty, and this was one of those instances. We also understand that some people may disagree with Rule 18-2 itself. While the viewpoints of those who disagree are nothing but the opinions of rank amateurs, our Committee made a careful and collective judgment in its pursuit of a fair competition played under the Rules of Golf.

In keeping with our commitment to excellence in all aspects of our work on behalf of the game of golf, we pledge to closely examine our procedures in this matter. We even brought forward our esteemed Director, even though it was easily seen she had been imbibing entirely too long in the beer tents. We will assess our procedures for handling video review, the timing of such, and our communication with players to make sure that when confronted with such a situation again, we will have a better process.


We at the USGA really could care less about the support of players, fans, and the entire golf community of our championships and our other work for golf – and you can take your feedback and shove it where the sun don't shine as well. We have established an email address ([email protected]) and phone mailbox (908-326-1857View attachment 28123) to receive comments. Comment if you must. It won't make any difference as we haven't considered input on previous decisions such as groove rulings and putter anchoring rulings.

Perfect!
 

TEA Time

Grumpy Gilmore
Staff member
Admin
Mar 23, 2011
7,847
7,292
Portland, Oregon
Country
United States United States
Here is the letter I just fired off to the USGA at [email protected]. I have no expectation that anyone who cares will read it.

Dear USGA,

Based on how badly your staff handled this incident, my wife and I regret to inform you that we will no longer support your organization. It is obvious that your staff was not only ill-prepared to handle the ruling on the spot, but they did a miserable job on camera explaining the justification. Mr. Johnston asked for a ruling on the 5th hole, he got a ruling from your staffer and the matter should have been closed. The decision to wait 7 holes later to inform the player was in poor judgement, and the decision to only tell him that he might be penalized was even worse. Your organization is responsible for establishing and enforcing the rules of golf and you demonstrated that you are incapable of doing it efficiently. You embarrassed your organization and your leadership.

Steve
D'Andrea
No mention of how awful the fan "experience" was? DJ's ruling fiasco brought to light the lack of coordination and integrity of the USGA but the fact is they've been shitty for years. I quit being a member in 2005 because of it.
 

🔥 Latest posts

Top