Bignose
Well-Known Member
- Oct 23, 2006
- 426
- 2
I just don't understand the level of naivety. You naysayers really think that there isn't a strong motivation to cheat? Not when there isn't millions of dollars on the line? I agree that it isn't any of the top players, but if you are struggling to make number 125 on the money list and keep your card isn't that a big incentive? Or trying to get through Q school?
If the TOUR doesn't test, it is implicitly saying that it is okay to cheat.
I am also tired of hearing how "roid rage" will destroy your golf game. If you look at some of my previous posts, I have talked about how there are a wide range of performance enhancing drugs that would benefit golfers tremendously.
Look. If human beings were all rational and fair with each other, you are correct, testing wouldn't be needed. But, I'm sorry if this is news to you, humans beings are irrational and devious. If there is an advantage to be had, the temptation will get the better of some people. Golfers aren't immune from being human. Just because golf is their sport of choice, doesn't make them a better person than if they were able to play baseball or football or cycling or track and field or lollipop licking. If there is money to be made by getting better at your sport of choice, and you weren't going to get caught -- people are going to cheat. People have tried to cheat at golf all the time, some successfully, some unsuccessfully.
At least with testing, the TOUR is telling them explicitly that it is not okay to use performance-enhancing drugs, and the cheaters will have to use more sophisticated techniques. The doping won't stop, but at least the cheaters will have to work harder at it, and maybe a few will reconsider what they are doing. It is always a race between the dopers and the detectors, there will always be some new performance enhancer that will be undetectable for a few years, but you have to at least try to put an end to it to be fair to the entire field.
Sure, it has been said, "Just test Tiger, and if he's clean, does it really matter?" To the rest of the world, probably not. But, I guarantee it matters to that young guy going through Q school or struggling to keep his tour card. If you were one place out of being a top finisher Q school, but you knew that the guy who got that place ahead of you used performance enhancers illegally, wouldn't you be awfully streamed about it?
How can you naysayers just ignore all these issues as "a huge waste of money and time"?
If the TOUR doesn't test, it is implicitly saying that it is okay to cheat.
I am also tired of hearing how "roid rage" will destroy your golf game. If you look at some of my previous posts, I have talked about how there are a wide range of performance enhancing drugs that would benefit golfers tremendously.
Look. If human beings were all rational and fair with each other, you are correct, testing wouldn't be needed. But, I'm sorry if this is news to you, humans beings are irrational and devious. If there is an advantage to be had, the temptation will get the better of some people. Golfers aren't immune from being human. Just because golf is their sport of choice, doesn't make them a better person than if they were able to play baseball or football or cycling or track and field or lollipop licking. If there is money to be made by getting better at your sport of choice, and you weren't going to get caught -- people are going to cheat. People have tried to cheat at golf all the time, some successfully, some unsuccessfully.
At least with testing, the TOUR is telling them explicitly that it is not okay to use performance-enhancing drugs, and the cheaters will have to use more sophisticated techniques. The doping won't stop, but at least the cheaters will have to work harder at it, and maybe a few will reconsider what they are doing. It is always a race between the dopers and the detectors, there will always be some new performance enhancer that will be undetectable for a few years, but you have to at least try to put an end to it to be fair to the entire field.
Sure, it has been said, "Just test Tiger, and if he's clean, does it really matter?" To the rest of the world, probably not. But, I guarantee it matters to that young guy going through Q school or struggling to keep his tour card. If you were one place out of being a top finisher Q school, but you knew that the guy who got that place ahead of you used performance enhancers illegally, wouldn't you be awfully streamed about it?
How can you naysayers just ignore all these issues as "a huge waste of money and time"?