- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #31
David B said:Well, the main thing is that Uranium is found in nowhere near the concentrations it is after refinement... it's found in an ore just like most other elements, with a dilute dispersal, which must then be heavily concentrated for it to function inside a nuclear reactor.
David,
I'm not trying to push buttons, nor single you out with any of this. Please don't take it this way (if you are! LOL...)
Here's an image of the province I live in. It's easy to draw, that's why I live here! LOL. The city in the south is where I am. The pink area of the north is Uranium rich ground, all of it housing millions of tons of ore grad uranium. It's been this way for at least 2.8 million years at minimum. All of it is sheild rock, more than capable of housing nuclear by product (I use the term byproduct because "waste" sounds so dirty).
This is to scale as well. So as you can see, there are vast areas of the world that have the potential to both provide and house nuclear fuels.
That area of the west that is a circle is an impact area from a meterorite 2.3 million years ago. Now, if that's not an indication of a "Natural Diaster" , then I don't know what one is.
Yes, we have to think beyond our generation for this, but we also must not think of the past when we dwell on what decisions must be made for the future. Times have changed.
Now, if we could just come up with the 900 million - 1.2 billion dollars for infrastructure and facility upgrades, we'd be laughing!
R35