- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- #16
Amen, Eracer...
Welcome To ShotTalk.com!
We are one of the oldest and largest Golf forums on the internet with golfers from around the world sharing tips, photos and planning golf outings.
Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon!
A 63* PW is indeed flatter than a 65* PW.
unless the 65 has a shorter shaft
In dave's defense, if the shaft was shorter, in order to play it, the lie would have to be adjusted.
But shaft length has no bearing on what the static lie angle is.
R35
Dave, your point is another interesting issue in this confusing industry. I've seen hackers, over the years, (other hackers, 'cause I'm one) that couldn't begin to carve a draw. They also have a problem with distance. Some "expert" tells them to lengthen the shafts in their irons and they will increase distance. Off to a basement 'glue guy' they go and have 1" or 2" plugs put in the shafts to stretch them out. Suddenly, they are hitting draws to hooks. Why? Because, lengthening the shaft makes the lie play more upright. And, with the toe closing and departing draw spin, they gain distance. The slightly longer arc did not have near the impact on the distance gain as did the draw spin. But, suddenly, they are out telling everyone they gained 10 yards per iron by lengthening the shafts 1".Thats what I meant,just wanted to ensure anyone passing picks this up,shorten the shaft and you flatten the lie for your swing,although technically the lie remains unaltered
And, to add to the confusion... The shorter the iron in our sets, the more upright the lie angle. As we progress from the 3 iron through the pitching wedge the shafts get shorter and the lie becomes more upright. Yet, as you so correctly state, if you cut a shaft off... make the shaft shorter... the playing lie becomes flatter!!! Go figure!Thats what I meant,just wanted to ensure anyone passing picks this up,shorten the shaft and you flatten the lie for your swing,although technically the lie remains unaltered