• Welcome To ShotTalk.com!

    We are one of the oldest and largest Golf forums on the internet with golfers from around the world sharing tips, photos and planning golf outings.

    Registering is free and easy! Hope to see you on the forums soon!

Marty of the BB4

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
I am convinced if I played well, I could bet him!

From what I saw on the big break he was pathetic the only reason he got so far was because of pure luck! He has no raw talent, he didn't play any shot correctly e.g the flop over the bunker thomos and warren take a 56 bump it over the bunk and it runs out to a couple of feet, marty takes a 60*opens his stance and whacks down on this thing and is lucky to clear the bunker.

He continously missed the green with wedges annd 9 irons, he hit a few drives OB, and a couple of pure duffs and shanks!

He was a embarresment. And to top of his poor game his attitude stunk taking divots out of one of the finest course in the world, in bad temper because his swing can't hold up under pressure!

He was a hot headed idiot that didn't have any sportsmanship.

All the rest of the guys have game; but marty sucked and so did his awful golf swing.

Thanks for listening.
 

SiberianDVM

I love Hooters
Moderator
Jul 25, 2005
8,781
1,535
Augusta, GA
Country
United States United States
How do you really feel ? :)

I thought Marty was one of the weaker players, because of his inexperience and excitability.

I would love to have his height, power potential, and flexability, though.
 
OP
T

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #3
SiberianDVM said:
How do you really feel ? :)

I thought Marty was one of the weaker players, because of his inexperience and excitability.

I would love to have his height, power potential, and flexability, though.


Yeah but I can't see him getting anywhere without making some drastic changes quickly.
 

dave.

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2005
5,926
2
Being a 'pro' doesn't neccessarily mean you are great.Many are no better than a 1 or 2 handicapper.In a recent pro-am I hacked around in 12 pars and 6 bogeys,and beat half the pros!
 
OP
T

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #5
dave. said:
Being a 'pro' doesn't neccessarily mean you are great.Many are no better than a 1 or 2 handicapper.In a recent pro-am I hacked around in 12 pars and 6 bogeys,and beat half the pros!


I thought the winners of the show got European tour excemption(s), I must of mis-understood.

He has no game for tour, yes most club pro's are around the 1 or 2 handicap, but after all there are golf pro's and pro golfers. and Marty is a golf pro.
 

dave.

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2005
5,926
2
Yes they do,but its just for one off comps.Marty I think is on the Euro Pro tour,and I doubt he won anything.
 

Davebud

Crackhead Zebra
Oct 31, 2005
1,723
0
TJ sucks

I do not know why you are going off on Marty, he has a way better chance than TJ. TJ is all mouth, and always in the rough. Marty had the class to concede the hole in match play, TJ had to be coerced to concede his hole.
 
OP
T

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #8
Davebud said:
I do not know why you are going off on Marty, he has a way better chance than TJ. TJ is all mouth, and always in the rough. Marty had the class to concede the hole in match play, TJ had to be coerced to concede his hole.

TJ does talk a load of bull crap, but for some reason I like him.. I love when he holes a put he says thank you about 10 times in a weird voice.

And he is very dramatic but I like it, I hope he wins, and he is a pretty good player.

Put it this way if it was a 4 round stroke play Warren would of walked it.
 

Davebud

Crackhead Zebra
Oct 31, 2005
1,723
0
I think that Guy might have had something to say

Guy routinely pulls rabbits out of his hat and might have given Warren a real run of it. Warren may be a more solid player but that doesn't mean he would have walked away with it. If the best player always won, Tiger would never lose.
 
OP
T

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #10
Davebud said:
Guy routinely pulls rabbits out of his hat and might have given Warren a real run of it. Warren may be a more solid player but that doesn't mean he would have walked away with it. If the best player always won, Tiger would never lose.

Correct but Warren is playing against a pack of muppets apart from Guy.

Another thing I didn't like, obviosuly the europeans are a better team, but I thought it was unfair that they had to go down to 2 players each it could of been 4 Europeans in the final???? A bit unfair IMO.
 

Farquod

Short Game Tragedy
Mar 8, 2005
1,165
0
The master said:
Correct but Warren is playing against a pack of muppets apart from Guy.

Thomas isn't too bad, either.

I think 3 of the 4 are where they should be. TJ is outclassed.

Marty is a major head case. A rather tall head case, at that.

Paul might have something to say about it, but my money's on Guy.

...which means that Guy is now toast. ;)
 
OP
T

The master

online
Oct 24, 2004
1,735
5
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #12
Sorry your right Thomos is solid, there are a few solid players, but some I wouldn't pick for my local club teams.
 

🔥 Latest posts

Top