I've got the pants that'll make you dance!
- Jun 11, 2007
I understand it was an example, but it's not even close to applicable. Go back and read your initial response and pretend you are the OP. You would not be offended if someone basically told you what to talk about and who to be a fan of (or not)? I'm just sayin, that is kinda how it looks. I wouldn't call a post solely about the measure of humanity in killing a cow -vs- a seal on topic either. Let's pretend that Fisher re-signed in as a newbie and started this thread using Sean Ohair's name.... I bet this thread would've never turned into a spat about any isms or the morality thereof.
As I said in my original reply, this could have been a valid discussion had tigers name not been put into the mix. But when fisher CHOSE to put tigers name in there, and let's face it there's no two ways about, he has an obsession with the man, he turned this into another love-in. I've had enough of them as I'm sure a LOT of us have, and called it as such. And every reply I've had has been on topic to a post from him.
And for the record, I will say that a claim of being a few strokes better due to bad surfaces on tour, regardless of who a player is including ohair, is just stoopid. I would have replied the same regardless of who he put in there, but he chose tiger, and that's what caused the further discussions. It's all due to his own previous posting history.