I think it's pretty safe to assume that a lower CG will result in a higher ballflight. If you had a big, heavy soleplate, that would elevate the ball much higher than one that had weight more on the "horizon" of the impact zone.
Weights for and aft help more with MOI and the resistance to twisting, more or less. But the height at which they are established helps with ballflight too in terms of launch angle at impact.
Remember the original HiBore? It had a really low CG and you could hit an 8.5* driver super high. This was a big reason why they were "disappoiting", as everyone was so honed in on "higher loft for carry" when the technology was basically back-asswards of that. You'd go down a degree in the hiBore.
Anyways, my 2 cents.
R35
Weights for and aft help more with MOI and the resistance to twisting, more or less. But the height at which they are established helps with ballflight too in terms of launch angle at impact.
Remember the original HiBore? It had a really low CG and you could hit an 8.5* driver super high. This was a big reason why they were "disappoiting", as everyone was so honed in on "higher loft for carry" when the technology was basically back-asswards of that. You'd go down a degree in the hiBore.
Anyways, my 2 cents.
R35