grazo
slacker hacker
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2004
- Messages
- 108
- Reaction score
- 0
In light of the abysmal effort by the good ol' US of A, I put forward that the Ryder Cup should now be played between the victorious European team, and the Internationals from the Presidents Cup. I for one would like to see:
Garcia vs Scott
Els vs Monty
Singh vs Clarke
Goosen vs Harrington
Weir vs Poulter
The list goes on...
Seriously though, can anyone come up with a way that there could be a tourney to decide who is the best? Should the Euros now play the Internationals in 2005 and the winner of that play the US in 2006 and so on? The undisputed world champions could then be the team that wins 2 events in succession?
I love the drama of the Ryder and Presidents Cups, although the Ryder has much more meaning and history behind it. Unfortunately it doesn't get the coverage it should Down Under and it seems a shame that a fantastic event like this should be missing half of the world's top 10 players (Singh, Els, Goosen, Scott are all top 10, Appleby is just outside).
What do you guys think?
:ausflag:
Garcia vs Scott
Els vs Monty
Singh vs Clarke
Goosen vs Harrington
Weir vs Poulter
The list goes on...
Seriously though, can anyone come up with a way that there could be a tourney to decide who is the best? Should the Euros now play the Internationals in 2005 and the winner of that play the US in 2006 and so on? The undisputed world champions could then be the team that wins 2 events in succession?
I love the drama of the Ryder and Presidents Cups, although the Ryder has much more meaning and history behind it. Unfortunately it doesn't get the coverage it should Down Under and it seems a shame that a fantastic event like this should be missing half of the world's top 10 players (Singh, Els, Goosen, Scott are all top 10, Appleby is just outside).
What do you guys think?
:ausflag:
