hmmm! a little rough there dont ya think ?
Not sure if that was in relation to my post, but if so, the answer would be likely not rough enough.
Again, you gave advice to someone in another thread that people should use this method because a select group of pros do so on swingvision and it seems to work for you so it should be the adopted method. I thought that was simply poor advice and posed a legitimate question as to why it would not be right for everyone (specifically the OP in the other thread), and as was indicated in my prior post in that thread that you questioned. You then failed to respond yet later posed a similar response over here, I then copied the information over and posed other similar questions and analogies to what appeared to be your train of thought, to which you simply said
I have no idea what that means :ugly25:
If you want to post an opinion about something such as this that contradicts what a large majority of instructors, club designers and such feel to be the proper way to hit a club, then great. However, when question is brought up in relation to the technique, simply not responding, or dismissing it and say "A bunch of pro's do this on swingvision, and it works for me, so it must be the best way" is not adequate support to recommend it to everyone who asks IMO.
Sadly, I even stated in the other thread that I use a similar technique, however just because it works for me and small minority of Pro golfers do so does not mean it is correct. So tell me, exactly what percent of pro golfers use this technique? Maybe 2-5%??? What technique were the rest taught to use?? It just goes against the sole basis for how the club was designed to be hit, but simply because it works well for me, it doesn't mean it is the way to go for everyone. It likely works well for me because it disguises and ongoing swing flaw of a slight early unhinging of my wrists, and if I move it forward I hit weak, high hooks. Although I do still hit the ball on a slight upswing, just not as much. It likely works for pros because the majority of the ones who do so have a 130mph swing and can get the ball airborne and to go a long way by simply using the loft of the club. The fact that it may affect their ballspin and cost them yards for consistency is unimportant to them even if they know that it is doing so.
So if you feel that is a little rough, so be it. Maybe if you feel so, it may be in your best interests to not offer controversial advice if you are unwilling to support the opinion outside of saying "It works for pro's on swingvision".
Heck, based on the support that you provided, much of which only contradicts the physics behind striking the ball. Which was why I posted the other ridiculous analogies, I do not feel they were any more ridiculous than you comments that you offered for support about finding the bottom of your swing and not turning a driver into a 3w. Why do you need a 3w, couldn't you simply use the driver off the deck based on what you have said????