cypressperch
Well-Known Member
Titleist irons. Hit six-iron demos of Mizuno 32, 60, and 67 and Titleist CB925 and MB925. I hit them all pretty good which is now making the whole process pretty confusing. The Mizuno clubs all felt amazingly alike though there are obvious differences in the heads. I guess I am happy that my swing works well with all of them, but we are always told that there is a perfect club out there awaiting us. Beginning to wonder about the way certain clubs are described by the companies that produce them and just how much difference "major innovations" really make. I am leaning towards the Mizuno 60 and the reason is the extra forgiveness these clubs are said to have, but it cannot be that much more. Strangely, none of these irons go as far as my 1976 Spalding Topflite Pro-Forged blades, but I am beginning to understand that these clubs have a smaller sweet spot as a result of being longer. Might just have them rechromed and re-grooved again. Today's woods are so much improved over the old stuff, but I am not sure I can say the same about today's irons. Any comments would be appreciated. Sincerely, Cypressperch