2017 Sizzle/Fizzle Thread

[TEA Time]

I've gotta be winning this thing.

 

[Fairwaysplitter3320]

I've gotta be winning this thing.

I reckon youre right.

 

[TEA Time]

Sizzle: Tiger Woods
Fizzle: Alex Noren

This seems really stoopid right now...

Hey now, the doctor cleared him for slow-mo chipping so there's still a chance...

 

[Fairwaysplitter3320]

Hey now, the doctor cleared him for slow-mo chipping so there's still a chance...

Ha!

 

[limpalong]

Sizzle: Hideki Matsuyama
Fizzle: Danny Willett (if he qualifies) If not, Justin Rose.

That one is lookin' pretty good!!!

 

[limpalong]

This seems really stoopid right now...

When you posted in April 3rd... it was "stooped". Today.... It's even "stoopedier"!!!

 

[TheTrueReview]

That one is lookin' pretty good!!!

Thank you kind sir!

 

[Fairwaysplitter3320]

When you posted in April 3rd... it was "stooped". Today.... It's even "stoopedier"!!!

 

[TEA Time]

The calculation is below:

(SizzleEndWGR - SizzleStartWGR) + (-(FizzleEndWGR - FizzleStartWGR)) = Total Adjusted Score

So a negative score is good?

This is what I get right now:

 

[eclark53520]

So a negative score is good?

This is what I get right now:

View attachment 29396

lol, uh.....no

 

[TEA Time]

I typed it in exactly as you described.
Siz End - start + (-) Fiz end - start
Rahm's sizzle went from 137 to 5 (5-137)
Kirk's fizzle went from 74 to 136 (136-74)
(5-137) + (-(136-74))
(-132)+(-(62)
-132-62= -194

 

[eclark53520]

I typed it in exactly as you described.
Siz End - start + (-) Fiz end - start
Rahm's sizzle went from 137 to 5 (5-137)
Kirk's fizzle went from 74 to 136 (136-74)
(5-137) + (-(136-74))
(-132)+(-(62)
-132-62= -194

I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.


EDIT: I see what you did now....WGR = World Golf Rank Score, not place. I use the actual score that they use to determine the place.

 

[Fairwaysplitter3320]

I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.

In this scenario I believe a negative score is correct, if the formula is correct. Rahm is mikes ahead of where he started and Kirk dropped.

Am I missing something?

 

[Fairwaysplitter3320]

I was commenting on the 'a negative score is good' comment. You nailed the formula.

In this scenario I believe a negative score is correct, if the formula is correct. Rahm is mikes ahead of where he started and Kirk dropped.

Am I missing something?

 

[eclark53520]

I will update to show that I use the score, not the actual rank. WGRS.

EDIT: Just kidding...too late to edit that original post. I do note in everything BUT the formula that I'm using score, not numbered rank.

Anyone else having trouble posting? It's acting very strange lately.

 

[limpalong]

Anyone else having trouble posting? It's acting very strange lately.

Lark, I'm having no trouble at all posting on the best golf discussion board available to users of the internet... Shot Talk... with my usually short and concise, to the point, posts of great interest to so many valued members of before mentioned discussion board... using nothing but to-the-point sentences and comments on each thread.

 

[limpalong]

Anyone else having trouble posting? It's acting very strange lately.

Lark, I'm having no trouble at all posting on the best golf discussion board available to users of the internet... Shot Talk... with my usually short and concise, to the point, posts of great interest to so many valued members of before mentioned discussion board... using nothing but to-the-point sentences and comments on each thread.